Capitalism a Game Built on the Backs of the Working Class Art

Untangling Fine art's relationship with Capitalism

BUY THE Book

Capitalist crisis does not begin within fine art, simply art tin can reverberate and amplify its effects, to positive and negative ends. Gregory Sholette, writer of the new bookDelirium and Resistance: Activist Art and the Crisis of Commercialism, examines the disjunct between declarations of art'south virtue and high moralism, with the political economy of the cultural sector, whilst outlining his term 'Bare Art': a denuding of art's entanglement with commercialism.

———————

'Fine art is not a luxury, not an adornment of civilization. It is a necessity. It is 1 of the central purposes of culture.' Thus begins a recent article by David Rothkopf in the online edition of Foreign Policy magazine, a liberal-leaning policy organ of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, of which Rothkopf is both the editor and CEO.  The op-ed goes on to explicate that, 'Artists lead in means politicians, chief executives, or generals cannot. They enable us to explore the mysterious — deep within us and all around us,' adding that 'diplomats accept found art and culture to be invaluable tools.' Just he also cautions the profound ability of fine art is useful for political conquests including terrorist campaigns:

'The Taliban blew up the aboriginal fine art of Afghanistan. The Islamic Country did the same in Palmyra and beyond Syrian arab republic and Republic of iraq. Statues are toppled during revolutions. Art and artifacts that accept become symbols of nations are seized or claimed near as talismans that bring with them legitimacy or connections.'

After rightly bemoaning the recently elected US government's desire to defund the arts, he points out that the United Arab Emirates (UAE) is taking bold steps to become the globe's next cultural capital. This is an ambitious make-over proposal requiring delirious levels of infrastructure spending. This includes a new 330 1000000 dollar Dubai Opera House, which is already boasting ticket sales outperforming New York's Metropolitan Opera, in addition to a new Louvre museum opening in Abu Dhabi later this year and a new Guggenheim museum designed by star architect Frank Gehry. Both of these projects, together with several other museums, performing arts structures, and a branch of New York University constitute the Saadiyat Island Cultural District. Saadiyat Isle is a 500 metre slab of dry desert sand, located just off the coast of Abu Dhabi, literally being terra-formed in sci-fi style, into what may well be the world'south largest 1% aristocracy gated customs at a price of some 27 billion petr0-dollars.

The UAE'south costly global culture initiative recently held its grand overture. Information technology was an impressive outcome billed as the 'showtime Culture Tiptop in Abu Dhabi,' and featured some 300 artists, arts administrators, media makers, tech leaders, and philanthropists from 80 international countries. Sponsored by the Abu Dhabi Tourism and Culture Authority, together with support from Rothkopf's Foreign Policy Group, it was farther made possible by the UAE's 370 Billion dollar Gross domestic product petrochemical fueled economy and inestimable savings on infrastructure costs thanks to medieval and oft pitiless migrant labour policies. All in all, the UAE is uniquely positioned in the Centre Due east to take acquit out such cultural world building, fifty-fifty though, as we shall see, the human being cost of this investment is annihilation only aesthetic. In fact, I would get so far every bit to contend that Abu Dhabi'southward fantastic cultural game plan is perfectly in sync with the very nature of contemporary fine art itself equally we round the corner of the 21^st Century.

According to the latest Amnesty International report, the United Arab Emirates arbitrarily restricts 'the rights to liberty of expression and association, detaining and prosecuting government critics, opponents and foreign nationals under criminal defamation and anti-terrorism laws.'

The UAE has also been widely criticised past homo rights groups for its embrace of the Kafala organization in which migrant labourers, primarily from Southeast Asia, who make up 90% of the workforce, are forbidden from forming unions that would meliorate working conditions:

'wages that fall far below acceptable standards in the West where such cultural industry market place brands as the Guggenheim and Louvre hail from. While some contempo Ministerial Decrees seek to mitigate the worst forms of labour abuses in the UAE, domestic workers are included in these untested reform efforts, and many of the 450,000 domestics are women of colour from The Philippines, Republic of indonesia and Africa.'

It is startling therefore to read Rothkopf describe the UAE's new Civilisation Summit as an exploration of how art and civilization 'tin can be harnessed to produce positive social change: 'from combating vehement extremism to reversing climate alter, from empowering women to promoting arts educational activity', as well as, an attempt to 'harness the power of civilization for social good internationally.' I am not denying that the event did indeed embrace a wide range of global presenters, including many women and people of colour. Merely we must pause for me to point to a miracle I describe as 'Bare Fine art'. The term refers to the stripping away of high art'due south exceptional condition as a human endeavour that is resistant to and autonomous from capitalist relations of production, and the socially tumultuous field of raw cultural practice that is left behind.

Riffing off philosopher Georgio Agamben's well know phrase 'bare life,' 'bare art' is further elaborated on in my recent book Delirium and Resistance. Nosotros tin can get a glimpse of bare fine art's actuality by considering how many hundreds of exploited migrant labourers were required to realise the UAE's get-go Civilisation Summit, including the many who were minding the children and managing the households of the event organisers, and those tasked with constructing the spaces for performances and presentations, or preparing the banquets, and the migrant forces charged with cleaning upward afterwards.

Many of these migrant East Asian, Filipino and North African subalterns observe themselves deeply in debt to recruitment agencies in their dwelling house countries, fifty-fifty every bit UAE officials confiscate their passports every bit a precaution confronting escape. And whilst this invisible workforce is prohibited from seeking better working atmospheric condition, or organising amongst themselves, or speaking out confronting this oppression; bio-political restrictions that appear exactly opposite the freedoms enjoyed by most of the foreign guests who presented at the summit. I am non chastising the presenters then much as questioning the glaring paradoxes but disregarded by upshot organisers, who, in Rothkopf's words, run across culture as the 'most potent strength for good on the planet'.

How do we even begin to reconcile the noble-sounding objectives of the Foreign Policy Group and its UAE counterparts, every bit opposed to the ignoble reality that makes their superlative and the Saadiyat Island Cultural District possible in the first identify? Or, to put this differently, what are nosotros to make of such blatant contradictions and their transparent lack of address? I would contend that at this betoken in the development of technological communications it is simply not possible for the organisers, participants or attendees to claim ignorance of these paradoxes. In an age of ultra-accessible information overload and continuous self-promotion, the powerful and wealthy one% –from Church officials to CEOs, philanthropic capitalists, country authorities and fifty-fifty their socialist apparatchik equivalents – are no longer able to resolutely whorl-out the age-erstwhile narrative nearly the deep humanist value of art and culture. It'south a embrace story that is simply no longer tenable. Fifty-fifty as information technology goes on, flimsily seeking to divert attending from the demystified exposure of high culture in a Blank Art Earth.

Three reasons stand up out regarding these openly paradoxical weather condition:

First, there is the aforementioned reach and influence of the Internet. Little effort is needed today to grasp what Walter Benjamin famously asserted over seventy years ago that, 'there is no document of civilization which is not at the same time a certificate of barbarism.' This is for anyone connected to social networks (which ways almost everyone involved in the product of high culture) is penetrated by an inescapable symptom of contemporary life that nosotros might simply characterization as hyper-information sensation. Nosotros might cull to dismiss this knowledge, or possibly seek out 'alternative facts,' but ignoring it is not an option.

A second forcefulness behind the appearance of Blank Art is the art earth's own unrelenting self-analysis. Since at to the lowest degree the mid-1960s, artists have sought to expose the elitist mystification of high civilization in a practice referred to as 'institutional critique.' As the late John Berger starkly noted in 1972, 'Oil painting, before it was anything else, was a celebration of private property. Every bit an art-form information technology derived from the principle that yous are what you lot accept.' I will return to this betoken below past considering the piece of work of artist Hans Haacke who is ane of the architects of this procedure.

Simply these 2 determining explanations are joined today by a surprising and powerful third agency: the paradoxical demystifying role that deregulated capitalism plays within contemporary civilisation as an industry. Attempts by elites, as much as well-intentioned romantics, to pigment high art as an evocation of humanity's mysterious depths must come up to terms with the realities of a vertiginous 56 billion dollar fine art marketplace in a globally dispersed field where in that location are more artists, and more fine art works being produced, than perhaps e'er before in history. And withal, much every bit things are with the neoliberal economic system in general, this art world concentrates value among a small number of champions, leaving the majority to serve as its system of barely recognised reproduction and maintenance. I take in the past compared the art earth's political economy to cultural nighttime matter: a small, bright summit of highly visible artists whose stability is anchored by an internally marginalised and all but invisible multitude of artistic producers, including the thousands of professionally trained studio artists generated past higher education. According to a new Art Basel/UBS report on the 2017 art market place:

'Close to half of the value of sales on the auction market place came from just 1% of the artists whose work sold in 2016. Simply xv% of artists had works priced in backlog of $50,000, and a tiny fraction (merely over 1%) had works that sold for more than $1 million.'

The study goes on to land that 'the global share of sales from the four largest fine art markets in the Post War and Contemporary sector exceeded 90% by value in 2016, however they accounted for just 32% of total exhibitions,' and that 'despite this negative tendency in 2015 and 2016, sales accept advanced almost 180% since the market place recession in 2009 and accept increased 51% in the decade from 2006 to 2016'. Meanwhile, the average tuition paid past MFA students in the USA is $38,000. Needless to say, the corporeality of debt most will accept to carry later on graduating is astounding for a field distinguished by its all but guaranteed unemployment. All of which seems to undercut Rothkopf's claims near art's imagination being the 'virtually potent force for good on the planet.' In low-cal of high civilization's intimate kinship with, if not outright subsumption by, the global financial economic system, some serious doubt must creep into these assertions, only as they did with regard to the celebratory promotion of the cultural makeover by the homo-rights challenged UAE.

Prototype: Hans Haacke, On Social Grease, a detail of plaque with Richard M. Nixon quotation on photo-engraved magnesium plates mounted on aluminum, 76.two x 76.2 cm (each plaque), 1975.

—————–

It is constructive to compare the marketing of art today past the Foreign Policy Grouping and the Abu Dhabi Tourism and Culture Authorisation, with efforts in the 1960s and 1970s by Cold-State of war policy makers, corporate leaders and political agencies in the United States who promoted art as a form of ideological lubrication useful for countering rebellious workers, students, women and minorities during a time of social and economical upheaval. In 1975, the creative person Hans Haacke coolly and precisely exposed these mollifying intentions in a series of series of officious-looking, metal wall plaques presented as works of conceptual art. Each engraved panel is emblazoned with an actual citation in which art and culture are described equally useful for covering-up the less than noble pursuits past businesses and states. Appropriately entitled On Social Grease, the work includes engraved citations by Exxon executive Robert Kingsley stating 'Exxon'southward support of the arts serves every bit a social lubricant. And if business is to continue in big cities, it needs a more lubricated environment. Robert Kingsley,' and some other by Chase Manhattan Bank CEO David Rockefeller reflecting on the 'direct and tangible benefits' that art investing provides businesses, including attracting qualified employees and improving the 'corporate image.'

What prototype did Rockefeller hope to improve? Amidst other scandals he and his ideological ally Henry Kissinger supported the roughshod dictator Augusto Pinochet in Chile, and helped develop fiscal austerity measures for broke nations in Latin America and New York City following its 1975 economical collapse. Later, in 1979, he convinced President Jimmy Carter to let Rockefeller'southward friend the Shah of Islamic republic of iran entry to the US, leading to the hostage crisis and ultimately the downfall of Carter'southward presidency. In another piece Haacke cites President Richard M. Nixon remarking that, 'the arts have the rare capacity to help heal divisions among our people and to vault some of the barriers that divide the world,' remarkably anticipating Rothkopf's remarks some 38 years hence, but at present with regard to the unapologetically autocratic kingdoms that contain the UAE. What has changed since then?

For 1 matter, Hans Haacke's self-critical pre-Internet era art practice required a strong commitment to frequently tiresome investigative research that was truly unfamiliar to the globe of the visual arts at the time (every bit opposed say to journalism for case or art history for that matter). Nevertheless, once Haacke's findings were presented within the 'white cube' context of high culture these revelations generated a profound suspicion towards corporate cultural back up by the liberal art world audition.  Today, the ease with which data is attainable makes these cultural contradictions simpler to demonstrate on one paw, though strangely less consequential on the other paw. The air of suspicion is all the same present. In fact, a thick temper of 'critique' and even scepticism permeates high civilization, as it does most disciplines and fields of activeness. But this perpetual state of bad faith recedes into a background similar the rush of white noise in an function edifice leaving the paradoxes of the art world sitting forth side one some other, like so many units of discrete information. The reclamation of Haacke'southward legacy of exposition has required a still more engaged level of intervention, that of direct activeness into the museum space itself.

By no means a new phenomenon, in fact Haacke was a co-founder of Fine art Workers' Coalition in the tardily 1960s who straight confronted New York City museum'south with demands ranging from the rights of artists of color to providing social security for art laborers by selling off the valued work of dead artists. The interventionist museum exploits of Global Ultra Luxury Faction (GULF) confronting the development of the Guggenheim Abu Dhabi; the choreographed anti-petroleum industry demonstrations of Liberate Tate who successfully forced the museum to disconnect from British Petroleum; the staged protests of Decolonize This Identify against the whiteness of the fine art establishment; and the striking dramatic museum occupations by DebtFair and Occupy Museums whose contempo action at the Whitney Biennial collectively and publicly repudiating art student debt all bear witness to the revitalisation of active confrontation as the preferred grade of dissent in the epoch of Bare Art.

Images: Counter-Get-go Debtor'south Anniversary at the Whitney Museum.

———————

A counter-outset autonomous consequence organised past Occupy Museums at the Whitney Biennial in NYC took place on May 5, 2017 and a grouping of heavily indebted artists collectively argue that the Museum of Modernistic Art remove Larry D. Fink from its board of trustees. Fink is the co-founder and CEO of BlackRock Inc., a major global financial corporation that profits from belongings pupil debt, as well equally being on the lath of New York University, and an adviser to President Donald Trump.

But now the hr seems well-nigh too late to call out neoliberalism. Recently we've seen a political turn toward hyper capitalistic nationalism that has plant an even more cynical use for the American Dream. At present it is wielded as rhetorical entitlement deserved simply by white Americans; an entitlement that can be dispersed only when big populations who are not white are variously forgotten, targeted, ejected, killed.  The American Dream today is a wedge-producing weapon that is used to split confuse and enrage people in lodge to obscure the quiet counter-revolution. This counter-revolution is taking shape as a takeover of all levers of power by billionaires. Their taking of power depends on the withering away of democratic institutions such as schools and libraries. The Art World is a comfort zone for many of these billionaires. This is the counter-revolution of the Collector Class.

The Collector Course is taking consummate control of our space and time. They are remaking neighbourhoods into branded real manor-culture packages. The high-tech debt based economy converts people's time into fixed income avails. All of this becomes capital whose form can only flow up to the acme of the pyramid. In this equation art that does not perform the function of luxury nugget gets weeded out. Withal, artists and fifty-fifty institutions are start to resist.

——————–

Gregory Sholette is a New York-based artist, author and activist. His recent projects include Dark Matter Games in Venice, Italy and the exhibition DARKER at Station Independent Projects NYC consisting of large ink launder drawings addressing electric current political conditions. He is active with Gulf Labor Coalition and was a co-founder of the collectives Political Art Documentation/Distribution (PAD/D: 1980-1988), and REPOhistory (1989-2000). A former Mellon Fellow at the CUNY Center for the Humanities he is on the editorial board of FIELD, a new online journal focused on socially-engaged art criticism, and his most contempo publications include Delirium and Resistance: Activist Art and the Crunch of Capitalism, (Pluto 2017), and Dark Matter: Art and Politics in an Age of Enterprise Culture(Pluto Press: 2010). Sholette holds a PhD in History and Retentiveness Studies from the University of Amsterdam, The netherlands (2017), he is a graduate of the Whitney Contained Study Program in Critical Theory (1996), Graduate of University of California San Diego (1995), and The Cooper Union School of Art (1979), and teaches studio fine art and co-directs the new Social Do Queens MFA concentration at Queens College CUNY, and is an acquaintance of the Art, Design and the Public Domain program of Harvard University'due south Graduate Schoolhouse of Design.

——————–

Delirium and Resistance: Activist Art and the Crunch of Capitalism by Gregory Sholette is available from Pluto Press.

upchurchmagas2000.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.plutobooks.com/blog/art-and-capitalism/

Share this post